COURSE INTRODUCTION AND APPLICATION INFORMATION


Course Name
Philosophical and Historical Studies in Science
Code
Semester
Theory
(hour/week)
Application/Lab
(hour/week)
Local Credits
ECTS
MED 210
Fall/Spring
3
0
3
5
Prerequisites
None
Course Language
English
Course Type
Elective
Course Level
First Cycle
Mode of Delivery -
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course
Course Coordinator
Course Lecturer(s) -
Assistant(s) -
Course Objectives Examine the evolution, development and paradigm shifts of science and technology and analyze the philosophical content of knowledge in social dynamics throughout history.
Learning Outcomes The students who succeeded in this course;
  • 1. Recognize and evaluate of scientific knowledge
  • 2. Percept of the change that scientific knowledge has undergone in the historical process
  • 3. Analyze science and technology differentiation
  • 4. Investigate the effect of mathematical thinking in scientific evolution
  • 5. Differentiate common and different aspects of different scientific and research activities
Course Description This course includes the analysis of the theoretical transformations of evolution and information that science and technology history has had over the course of time.
Related Sustainable Development Goals

 



Course Category

Core Courses
Major Area Courses
Supportive Courses
X
Media and Managment Skills Courses
Transferable Skill Courses

 

WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES

Week Subjects Required Materials
1 What is to know? Why history of science? Why philosophy of science? To investigate the inseparable unity of history of science and philosophy of science. Ladyman, James. 2002. Understanding Philosophy of Science. Routledge Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
2 The study of the differences between common knowledge and scientific knowledge. The basics of epistemology. The premises of epistemological analysis. Ladyman, James. 2002. Understanding Philosophy of Science. Routledge Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).Kuhn, T., “The Essential Tension-Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change,” University of Chicago Press, 1977.
3 The concept of paradigm. Conceptual revolutions in the history of science. Investigation of paradigm shifts by historical examples. LABORATORY LIFE: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Bruno Latour · Steve Woolgar Princeton University Press, 1986
4 The impact of paradigm shifts to the present scientific advances based on historical examples. The investigation of decisive examples like solar system, classical physics, quantum physics, the discovery of oxygen. Ladyman, James. 2002. Understanding Philosophy of Science. Routledge Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
5 Physical laws and explanation: Investigation of the nature scientific theories Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
6 Thomas Kuhn: Dealing with the structure of scientific revolutions. Searching for current examples Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
7 Analyzing and evaluation of natural and social sciences based on method and epistemology. Philosophy of Biology A Contemporary Introduction Alex Rosenberg and Daniel W. McShea Routlegge, 2008
8 Methods used in the production of scientific knowledge Philosophy of Biology A Contemporary Introduction Alex Rosenberg and Daniel W. McShea Routlegge, 2008
9 Studying the epistemological features of science and mathematics and the role of mathematics in natural sciences. Philosophy of Biology A Contemporary Introduction Alex Rosenberg and Daniel W. McShea Routlegge, 2008
10 What is mathematics? How the mathematical knowledge is attained? What is the historical evolution of mathematical thought? Philosophy of Biology A Contemporary Introduction Alex Rosenberg and Daniel W. McShea Routlegge, 2008
11 Is mathematics invented or discovered? The philosophical dimensions of mathematical knowledge and approaches of different philosophical schools. Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
12 The investigation of the evolution of technology with examples from the history of mathematics. The social impact of scientific discoveries. Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
13 Studying the evolution theory within different approaches. Comparing the biological evolution with the evolution of the production of scientific knowledge. Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
14 Science as a culture: The discussions on social and natural sciences and psychoanalysis. Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
15 The social and psychological components of science. Problems and applications. Examples of modern science. Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
16 General evaluation of the evolution of scientific and mathematical thinking. Kuhn, T., “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970(1962).
Course Notes/Textbooks

Khun, T., “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” The University of Chicago Press, 1967 Schick, T., “Readings in the Philosophy of Science,” Mayfield Publishig Company, 2000. Omnes, R., “Quantum Philosophy: Understanding and Interpreting Contemporary Science,” Princeton University Press, 1999.

Suggested Readings/Materials

 

EVALUATION SYSTEM

Semester Activities Number Weigthing
Participation
Laboratory / Application
Field Work
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
2
30
Portfolio
Homework / Assignments
Presentation / Jury
Project
Seminar / Workshop
Oral Exam
Midterm
2
40
Final Exam
1
30
Total

Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade
4
70
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade
1
30
Total

ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE

Semester Activities Number Duration (Hours) Workload
Course Hours
(Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
16
3
48
Laboratory / Application Hours
(Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
16
3
Study Hours Out of Class
15
1
15
Field Work
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
2
3
Portfolio
Homework / Assignments
Presentation / Jury
Project
Seminar / Workshop
Oral Exam
Midterms
2
3
Final Exams
1
5
    Total
128

 

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP

#
Program Competencies/Outcomes
* Contribution Level
1
2
3
4
5
1

Explain the normal structure and functions of the human body at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ and system levels, associate them with suggestions, practices and clinical situations (nutrition, exercise, vaccination, mental health, etc.); to protect and improve the health of individuals.

2

Describe the mechanisms of diseases at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ and system levels and make evidence-based decisions by associating them with disease findings, diagnosis and treatment approaches.

3

Consider the ethical principles, scientific facts, legal regulations and the biopsychosocial and cultural characteristics of the patient in the medical decision making process. Place importance and respect the autonomy of patients and the confidentiality of patient information, within the framework of the law and the provisions of healthcare application standards.

X
4

Prioritize patient safety to minimize malpractice by carrying out risk assessment, take the necessary precautions, perform the necessary medical practice and record them.

X
5

Communicate healthily, openly and effectively with healthcare workers, patients and their relatives, with the communication structured on empathy and care, trust and constructiveness; while being respectful to language, belief, race and cultural characteristics.

6

By bearing in mind the patients’ values, beliefs, priorities, and needs; provide evidence-based options and include them in the decision making process.

X
7

Preserve our planet’s resources and consider its effects on the public and individual’s health, advocate to disseminate healthy lifestyle behaviors and modify factors that affect health adversely.

X
8

Reach current, valid and reliable information effectively using technology. Critically evaluate this information for solving problems in an evidence-based medical decision-making process, bearing in mind prevention, diagnosis, and management of diseases.

9

Identify problems, create hypotheses, conduct research and employ teamwork to analyze results for generation and dissemination of health-related scientific knowledge.

X
10

By taking feedback and evaluating their performance, determine the areas and options for improvement and implement them within a plan.

X
11

Care for their own personal health, safety and appearance, take the necessary precautions in order to set an example for their colleagues and society.

12

Continuously renew themselves in their medical knowledge by always bearing in mind their commitment to lifelong learning principles.

X
13

Using various communication tools, share their professionally gained knowledge in the field of healthcare, opinions, experiences, and evaluations with institutions, colleagues and the public.  Advocate for healthcare and contribute to developing policies to protect and improve it.

*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest